Cases 61 - 70 of 270
Diaz v. M. et al
as 6:2019cv06906
Defendant:
Dr. John Morley, Naiomi M., Ms. Arnold and others
Plaintiff:
Miguel Diaz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz v. Attica Correctional Facility
as 6:2019cv06880
Petitioner:
Miguel Diaz
Respondent:
Attica Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Diaz v. Smith et al
as 9:2019cv01438
Defendant:
Geraldine M. Wilson, Eric J. Smith, Robert J. Lamica, II and others
Plaintiff:
Miguel Diaz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz-Agramonte v. USA
as 6:2019cv06678
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Luis Alberto Diaz-Agramonte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Diaz v. United States of America et al
as 1:2019cv03181
Defendant:
The Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States of America and United States Attorney General
Plaintiff:
Robert Diaz and Roberto Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Smith v. Dinoia et al
as 7:2019cv04471
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Holness, Detective John V. Peters, Commissioner Diaz and others
Plaintiff:
Devonte Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ayala-Rosario v. Westchester County et al
as 1:2019cv03052
Defendant:
Leandro Diaz, Graham, Westchester County and others
Plaintiff:
Tamir Ayala-Rosario
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Arkhurst et al
as 1:2019cv02831
Defendant:
Correction Officer John Doe #3, Correction Officer Sandy Arkhurst, Correction Officer Diaz and others
Plaintiff:
Moriyah Raziel Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mood v. Westchester County et al
as 7:2019cv02017
Defendant:
Francis Delgrosso, Raul Ulloa, Alexis Gendell and others
Plaintiff:
Tracy Mood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Valencia v. Westchester County et al
as 7:2019cv01699
Defendant:
Raul Ulloa, Alexis Gendell, Leandro Diaz and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Valencia and Frank E. Valencia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
