Cases 61 - 70 of 123
Ellis v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv09102
Plaintiff:
Anthony Malik Ellis
Defendant:
City of New York, Mayo, Shepperson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Mayo et al
as 1:2015cv09030
Plaintiff:
Anthony Malik Ellis
Defendant:
CO Mayo, CO Shepperson and CO Ford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Smith
as 1:2015cv05801
Petitioner:
Robert Ellis
Respondent:
Joseph T. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Malik v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv06484
Plaintiff:
Ellis Malik
Defendant:
City of New York, Russell, Pagan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sims v. Ellis et al
as 6:2015cv06355
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Sims
Defendant:
Andrew Ellis, Robert Mosko, K. Foose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv04121
Plaintiff:
Anthony Malik Ellis
Defendant:
City of New York, Russell, Pagan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Siddons et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv01198
Defendant:
AMKC Medical Clinic/Facility, Anna M. Kross Center ("AMKC"), Doctor Park of AMKC Medical Clinic Facility and others
Plaintiff:
Reginald Dupree, Jamel Edwards, Deshaun Gregory and others
Shield #817:
Captian Jogie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CABBAGESTALK v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WESTERN DIST et al
as 9:2015cv00167
Plaintiff:
MARVIN CABBAGESTALK
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WESTERN DIST, Hudson and Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Anderson v. Ellis, et al
as 1:2014cv01057
Plaintiff:
Romero Anderson
Defendant:
William Ellis and C.O.s on A-block 2 floor 7 to 3 shift
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pless v. City of Lagrange et al
as 1:2014cv09250
Plaintiff:
Ellis A. Pless
Defendant:
City of Lagrange, Troup County Police Sheriff Dept., James Woodruff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
