Cases 61 - 70 of 97
Chen v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2007cv00833
Petitioner:
Ming Guang Chen
Respondent:
Alberto R Gonzales, Michael Chertoff and A Neil Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Osman v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2007cv00814
Petitioner:
Semi Osman
Respondent:
Alberto R Gonzales, Michael Chertoff and A. Neil Clark
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Kostenko v. Gonzales
as 2:2007cv00804
Petitioner:
Andrey Kostenko
Respondent:
Alberto R Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Snetkov v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2007cv00796
Petitioner:
Aleksandr Snetkov
Respondent:
Alberto R Gonzales, Michael Chertoff and A Neil Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ahmed v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2007cv00785
Petitioner:
Jamal Ahmed Ahmed
Respondent:
Alberto R Gonzales, Michael Chertoff and A Neil Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Berezin v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2007cv00765
Petitioner:
Ivan Berezin
Respondent:
Alberto R Gonzales, Michael Chertoff and A Neil Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ramirez-Soto v. Clark et al
as 2:2007cv00731
Petitioner:
Jorge Ramirez-Soto
Respondent:
A Neil Clark, George Wigen, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Thind v. Chertoff et al
as 2:2007cv00726
Petitioner:
Kamaljit Thind
Respondent:
Michael Chertoff, Alberto Gonzales and Neil Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Qui v. Chertoff et al
as 2:2007cv00725
Petitioner:
Di Di Qui
Respondent:
Michael Chertoff, Alberto Gonzales and Neil Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gonzales-Guzman v. USA
as 2:2007cv00133
Petitioner:
Hipolito Gonzales-Guzman
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
