Cases 61 - 70 of 150
Hamilton v. Kelly et al
as 1:2020cv21318
Defendant:
Juan Acosta, John Kelly, Aldo Martin and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Dian Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hamilton v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv00146
Petitioner:
Terry Hamilton
Respondent:
Florida Attorney General and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bean v. Frizzell et al
as 5:2019cv00635
Plaintiff:
James Y Bean
Defendant:
A. Frizzell, FNU Hamilton, J. Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. United States Of America
as 1:2019cv24967
Defendant:
United States Of America
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv24469
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Perry v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2019cv00930
Defendant:
Warden of Hamilton, Annex and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
William Edward Perry, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. Butler et al
as 3:2019cv00925
Defendant:
Susan Simmon, Theresa Green, Brenda Butler and others
Plaintiff:
Lee A. Hamilton, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAMILTON v. SUNRISE AUTO SALES & RENTALS
as 1:2019cv00102
Defendant:
SUNRISE AUTO SALES & RENTALS
Petitioner:
DAMARON JAVON HAMILTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Attalah et al v. Mascara et al
as 2:2019cv14195
Plaintiff:
Chris Williams, Angel Roman, Luckner Petit-Frere and others
Defendant:
Aramark Contractor, Waxford Health Contractor and Ken J. Mascara
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. Port St. Lucie Police Department et al
as 2:2019cv14186
Defendant:
Saint Lucie County Sheriff's Office, Fort Pierce State Attorney Office and Port St. Lucie Police Department
Plaintiff:
Damaron Javon Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
