Cases 61 - 70 of 707
Moore v. Jones et al
as 5:2022cv01497
Plaintiff:
Kolby R Moore
Defendant:
Steaven Jones and Ricky Farris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2022cv01472
Plaintiff:
Matthew Joseph Jones
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Unknown Defendants and Pollock Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Boswell v. Jones
as 5:2022cv01351
Plaintiff:
David Ray Boswell
Defendant:
Michael Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Champagne, et al
as 2:2022cv01364
Plaintiff:
Terry Lynn Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Anthony P Champagne, Amanda Mustin, Cheleste Gottschalk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Craft et al
as 2:2022cv01200
Plaintiff:
Wendolyn Lee
Defendant:
Chris Craft, Amy Weirich, Carrolyn Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Martin et al
as 2:2022cv01163
Plaintiff:
Bryant K Jones
Defendant:
Heath Martin, Daniel Edward and Tangipahoa Parish
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Jones et al
as 3:2022cv00256
Plaintiff:
Melvin Johnson
Defendant:
Marcus Jones, Willard Gauthier, Lorencia James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Craft et al
as 2:2022cv00989
Plaintiff:
Wendolyn Lee and Wendolyn Dale Lee
Defendant:
Chris Craft, Amy Weirich, Carrolyn Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Neal et al
as 2:2022cv00845
Plaintiff:
Jonathan K'Shawn Jones and Johnathan K'Shawn Jones
Defendant:
Richard Petie Neal, EMT Morgan, EMT Kimberly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Houma Police Department
as 2:2022cv00748
Plaintiff:
Terry Lynn Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Houma Police Department, Dana Coleman and Unidentified Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
