Cases 61 - 70 of 76
Ruiz v. Borrow et al
as 4:2010cv05242
Plaintiff:
Michael Shannon Short
Defendant:
Vicki Borrow, Sharon Howell, Frank Hoake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. Doe #1 et al
as 3:2010cv02390
Plaintiff:
Mark Perez
Defendant:
John Doe #1, Jane Doe #1 and John Doe #2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ludwig v. Thaler et al
as 2:2010cv00114
Plaintiff:
Ronald David Ludwig
Defendant:
Assistant Warden Crites, Rick Thaler, John/Jane Doe #1 and others
Amicu:
TDCJ - Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vaughn v. Doe et al
as 3:2010cv00122
Plaintiff:
Martey Lee Vaughn
Defendant:
John Doe, John/Jane Doe #1, John/Jane Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Doe 1 et al
as 5:2010cv00056
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Williams
Defendant:
Jane Doe 1, David Hudson, Jeffrey Catoe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson et al v. Lacy et al
as 4:2010cv00743
Plaintiff:
Waqas Wilson, Adil Mohammad, Biniam Tekle Abraha and others
Defendant:
Robert Lacy, Kenneth Landgrebe, John Doe 1 to 50 and others
Movant:
Fazal Karim, Francisco J Espinosa, Rufino Revercio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ibarraroco v. Barnes et al
as 4:2009cv03085
Plaintiff:
Abigail Ibarraroco
Defendant:
Edwin Barnes, John Does 1-6 and Jane Does 1-2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muhammad v. Wilson et al
as 1:2009cv00279
Plaintiff:
Shaheed F Muhammad
Defendant:
FNU Wilson, FNU Kelly, Daren R Cassidy and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wiley v. Foxworth et al
as 6:2008cv00414
Plaintiff:
Charles R Wiley
Defendant:
Unknown Foxworth, Unidentified Goff, John and Jane Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wiley v. Foxworth et al
as 2:2008cv00190
Plaintiff:
Charles R Wiley
Defendant:
NFN Foxworth, NFN Goff, John and Jane Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
