Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Rhode Island
Cases 61 - 70 of 71
Ng v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2008cv00285
Petitioner: Hiu Lui Ng
Respondent: Michael Chertoff, John Torres, Bruce E. Chadbourne and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Barnes v. USA
as 1:2008cv00249
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: John Barnes
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Day v. Wall et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv00161
Plaintiff: Corey Day
Defendant: Ashbel T. Wall, Weeden, Kettle and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Laurence v. Wall et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv00109
Plaintiff: Norman Laurence
Defendant: Ashbel T. Wall, Jake Gadsen, James Weeden and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Islamic Sunni Ummah (Muslim Brotherhood) et al v. Wall et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv00094
Plaintiff: Islamic Sunni Ummah (Muslim Brotherhood), Corey Day, Juan Evora and others
Defendant: Ashbel T. Wall, Weeden, Kettle and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kimbrough v. USA
as 1:2008cv00078
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: John Kimbrough
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Pierce v. Ashbell T. Wall, II
as 1:2008cv00072
Plaintiff: John F Pierce
Defendant: Ashbell T. Wall, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ng v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2007cv00290
Petitioner: Hiu Lui Ng
Respondent: Michael Chertoff, Alberto Gonzales, John Torres and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Norman Laurence v. A.T. Wall, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv00081
Plaintiff: Norman Laurence
Defendant: A.T. Wall, George A. Vose, Jake Gadsden and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Laurence v. Wall et al
as 1:2007cv00066
Plaintiff: Norman Laurence
Defendant: Ashbel T. Wall, II, William Begones, Joseph Forgue and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?