Cases 61 - 70 of 443
Jiron v. No Named Respondent
as 1:2014cv02197
Petitioner:
Christina Jiron and Michael Jiron
Respondent:
Rio Grande County, Brabra Zollors and John Suthers
Defendant:
Larry Winegraner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rea, II v. Raemish et al
as 1:2014cv02090
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Rea, II
Defendant:
Rick Raemish, Randy Lind, Michelle Ruffini and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jimenez, et al v. Ruffini, et al
as 14-1272
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY L. JIMENEZ, SR.
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL D. REA
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHELLE RUFFINI, AVCF Mailroom, COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RICK RAEMISCH and others
Wallin v. Miller et al
as 1:2014cv01968
Petitioner:
Donald Oloyea Wallin
Defendant:
Michael Miller and John Suthers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dawson, Jr v. Suthers
as 1:2014cv01919
Plaintiff:
James R. Dawson, Jr
Defendant:
John Suthers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia v. Lind, et al
as 14-1266
Petitioner - Appellant:
JULIAN KEITH GARCIA
Respondent - Appellee:
RANDY LIND, Acting Warden of Arkansas Valley Correctional Facility, Colorado Department of Corrections and JOHN SUTHERS, The Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Chase v. Lind et al
as 1:2014cv01650
Petitioner:
Jerry L. Chase
Respondent:
Randy Lind and John Suthers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Garrett v. Raemisch, et al
as 14-1205
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL GARRETT
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK RAEMISCH, Exec. Director Colorado Dept. of Corrections, FRANCES FALK, Warden, Limon Correctional Facility and JOHN SUTHERS, Attorney General, State of Colorado
ROBINSON v. KING et al
as 1:2014cv00901
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WAYNE ROBINSON
Defendant:
PAUL A. KING, JAMES J. PETERS and JOHN SUTHERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carbajal, et al v. Keefer, et al
as 14-1203
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VICTORIA CARBAJAL, DEAN CARBAJAL and LUIS LEAL
Defendant - Appellee:
MITCHELL R. MORRISSEY, JEFFREY WATTS, ROBERT FULLER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
