Cases 61 - 69 of 69
Ham v. Marshall County, Kentucky et al
as 5:2011cv00011
Plaintiff:
Terrell W. Ham
Defendant:
Marshall County, Kentucky , Roger Ford , H. W. Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caldwell v. Marshall County, Kentucky et al
as 5:2011cv00008
Plaintiff:
Sharon Caldwell
Defendant:
Marshall County, Kentucky , Roger Ford , H. W. Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Treat v. Doe et al
as 3:2010cv00745
Plaintiff:
Jackie Treat
Defendant:
John and Jane Doe, Steven Shedlofsky, Scott Haas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benton v. Lexington Fayette Urban County Government et al
as 5:2010cv00171
Plaintiff:
Adrian L. Benton
Defendant:
Lexington Fayette Urban County Government, L.F.U.C.G. Detention Center Corporation, Ronald L. Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Finn v. Warren County, Kentucky et al
as 1:2010cv00016
Plaintiff:
Johney E. Finn, Johney E. Finn and Johney E. Finn
Defendant:
Warren County, Kentucky, Jackie Strode, Southern Health Partners, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tester v. Hurm et al
as 5:2009cv00318
Plaintiff:
Paul Tester
Defendant:
James Hurm, Tammy Osborne, Corrections Corporation of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Carter County, KY et al
as 0:2009cv00025
Plaintiff:
David M. Walker
Defendant:
Carter County, KY, Sheriff of Carter County, Kentucky, Kevin McDavid and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Estep v. Laurel County, Kentucky et al
as 6:2008cv00275
Plaintiff:
Darrell Andrew Estep
Defendant:
Laurel County, Kentucky, Lawrence Kuhl, Jack Sizemore and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Teague et al v. Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 3:2008cv00081
Plaintiff:
Ja-Ron S. Teague and John Does
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, Louisville Metro Government, Jerry Abramson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
