Cases 61 - 70 of 1,251
Allen v. Bradly et al
as 4:2023cv00222
Plaintiff:
Stevie Allen
Defendant:
Bradly, Warden Jones and CO II Mucconer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Bradly et al
as 4:2023cv00221
Plaintiff:
Stevie Allen
Defendant:
Bradly, Jones, Mucconer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Jones et al
as 4:2023cv00223
Plaintiff:
ReShaun Martin
Defendant:
Warden Joshua Jones, Sgt. McConnell and Officer Reyes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Wilcher et al
as 4:2023cv00275
Plaintiff:
Dushon Antwan Green
Defendant:
John T. Wilcher, Shalena Cook Jones and Lyle Burnham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Jones
as 1:2023cv04271
Petitioner:
Kerry Scott Mitchell
Respondent:
Warden Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grant v. Oliver et al
as 4:2023cv00207
Plaintiff:
Dayvon Grant
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver, Robert Toole, Kevin Sprayberry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burriss v. Walmsley et al
as 4:2023cv00269
Plaintiff:
Michael Burriss
Defendant:
Judge Timothy R. Walmsley, D.A. Shalena Cook Jones, A.D.A Candace Nicole Blyden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Burkes et al
as 4:2023cv00206
Plaintiff:
Dexter Shaw
Defendant:
Dr. Burkes, Dr. Malloy, Joshua Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brockington v. Jones et al
as 4:2023cv00204
Plaintiff:
Shieme Brockington
Defendant:
Warden Joshua Jones, Sgt. Holiday and Nurse Whatley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nance v. Langley et al
as 3:2023cv00173
Plaintiff:
Alzafas A. Nance
Defendant:
Terry Langley, Brad Robinson, Captain Shane Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
