Cases 61 - 70 of 1,247
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01049
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Kelly v. Allen et al
as 4:2022cv04038
Petitioner:
James Carl Kelly
Respondent:
T. Allen and D. Brisht
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Lynn Waters v. Walter Kelly et al
as 2:2022cv04733
Plaintiff:
Michael Lynn Waters
Defendant:
Walter Kelly, Ronald McMillan and Robert Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Montgomery v. Culum et al
as 2:2022cv01156
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Steven Montgomery
Defendant:
M. Culum, J. Gamez, M. Pesce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Montgomery v. Culum et al
as 1:2022cv00802
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Steven Montgomery
Defendant:
M. Culum, J. Gamez, M. Pesce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Madden
as 3:2022cv00951
Petitioner:
Kelly Beau Davis
Respondent:
Raymond Madden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Elliot Kimo Laanui v. Kelly Santoro
as 2:2022cv04365
Petitioner:
Elliot Kimo Laanui
Respondent:
Kelly Santoro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Akil Robbins v. Kelly Santoro
as 2:2022cv04234
Petitioner:
Akil Robbins
Respondent:
Kelly Santoro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Leandre Martell v. John Doe et al
as 2:2022cv04096
Plaintiff:
Leandre Martell
Defendant:
John Doe and Kellie Moss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonilla v. Simmons et al
as 4:2022cv03449
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Judge Kelly V. Simmons, Judge Faye D. Opal, Paul M. Haakenson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
