Cases 61 - 70 of 1,730
Ronnie Dave Lewis v. B. Cates
as 2:2023cv00718
Petitioner:
Ronnie Dave Lewis
Respondent:
B. Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harold Lewis Chaney v. Jack Fox
as 2:2022cv09428
Petitioner:
Harold Lewis Chaney
Respondent:
Jack Fox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Aaron Jonah Rosberg v. De Los Reyes et al
as 2:2022cv09365
Plaintiff:
Aaron Jonah Rosberg
Defendant:
De Los Reyes, Ugerio, Lo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Javier Balbuena v. J. Jackson et al
as 2:2022cv08789
Plaintiff:
Javier Balbuena
Defendant:
J. Jackson, D. Asuncion, Andrew P. Harman, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Reeves v. Diesslin et al
as 2:2022cv02084
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Reeves
Defendant:
Diesslin, Lewis and Mejia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Lewis v. Parks
as 1:2022cv01335
Plaintiff:
Brian Dion Lewis
Defendant:
S Parks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Loftis v. Arisco et al
as 1:2022cv01266
Plaintiff:
Marquise DeAngelo Loftis
Defendant:
A. Arisco, E. Garza, R. Montano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Freeman et al
as 4:2022cv05123
Plaintiff:
Thomas Marvin Lewis, Jr.
Defendant:
V. Freeman, E Torres, Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Lewis v. Newsome et al
as 1:2022cv01036
Plaintiff:
Daronta Tyrone Lewis
Defendant:
Gavin Newsome, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Deputy Director of CDCR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arron Michael Lewis v. M. Gutierrez
as 2:2022cv05832
Petitioner:
Arron Michael Lewis
Respondent:
M. Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
