Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Georgia
Cases 61 - 70 of 244
McCoy v. Hininger
as 1:2019cv00201
Petitioner: Morris Michael McCoy
Respondent: Damon Hininger, CEO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Morris v. Chatham County C.N.T Division We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2018cv00272
Defendant: Chatham County C.N.T Division
Plaintiff: Sammy Brian Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CORMICAN v. MORRIS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00081
Defendant: MITZI HALL DON, DeAnn Morris, Lt. Franklin and others
Plaintiff: JAMES ELIAS CORMILYN and James Elias Cormican
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Kendrick et al
as 4:2018cv00234
Defendant: Bert Poston, unknown Smiley, Melica Kendrick and others
Plaintiff: Kaesarea Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CORMILYN v. MORRIS et al
as 5:2018cv00370
Defendant: MITZI HALL DON, DEANN MORRIS and DEPUTY WARDEN FRANKLIN
Plaintiff: JAMES ELIAS CORMILYN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. United States of America et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00103
Defendant: B Smith, Stanley, Loveless and others
Plaintiff: John M. Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ricks v. Fears et al
as 1:2018cv04216
Defendant: William A. Fears, Richard G. Milam and Rhonda W. Smith
Plaintiff: Morris Ricks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORRIS v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 3:2018cv00098
Petitioner: NATHANIEL B MORRIS
Respondent: State of Georgia and Major Anthony Rhodes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Holmes v. Ford We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2018cv00177
Plaintiff: Morris Scott Holmes
Defendant: Warden FNU Ford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Milam v. Unnamed Defendant(s)
as 1:2018cv03074
Plaintiff: Willie Morris Milam
Defendant: Unnamed Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?