Cases 61 - 70 of 81
Gagne v. Clarke et al
as 1:2008cv12011
Plaintiff:
Albert Gagne
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Robert Murphy and Director of Treatment
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Baggett et al v. Murphy et al
as 4:2008cv40224
Plaintiff:
Michael Baggett
Defendant:
Carolyn Murphy, Deval L. Patrick, Timothy P. Murray and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Schmitt v. Murphy et al
as 4:2008cv40110
Plaintiff:
Joseph P. Schmitt
Defendant:
Robert F. Murphy, Kilroy, William McKay and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Schmitt v. Murphy et al
as 1:2008cv40110
Plaintiff:
Joseph P. Schmitt
Defendant:
Robert F. Murphy, Kilroy, William McKay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dutcher v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2008cv10122
Petitioner:
John E. Dutcher
Respondent:
Robert Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wickers v. Bender et al
as 1:2007cv12235
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Wickers
Defendant:
James Bender, Frank G. Cousins, Jr., Paul Gouin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mederos v. Murphy et al
as 1:2007cv12229
Petitioner:
Antonio Mederos
Defendant:
Robert Murphy, Michael Chertoff and U.S. Attorney General
Respondent:
Bruce Chadbourne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Santoni v. Pittsfield Police Department et al
as 3:2007cv30222
Plaintiff:
Angel Santoni
Defendant:
Pittsfield Police Department, John Soules, John P. Murphy, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Solomon v. Murphy et al
as 1:2007cv12086
Plaintiff:
David A. Solomon
Defendant:
Alyssa Murphy, Kathleen M. McKeon, Rourke Donnelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenney v. Murphy
as 1:2007cv11843
Petitioner:
Thomas Kenney
Defendant:
Robert Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
