Cases 61 - 70 of 72
Jackson v. Carlisle et al
as 5:2009cv00274
Plaintiff:
Curtis Jackson
Defendant:
Harold Carlisle, John Cary Bittick, Officer Haskin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peterson v. Howerton
as 1:2009cv01627
Petitioner:
Terri Lynn Peterson
Respondent:
Tony Howerton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Peterson v. Railey et al
as 1:2009cv00066
Plaintiff:
James Peterson
Defendant:
Christopher Railey, Benji Nobles, Officer Cleveland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant et al v. Perdue et al
as 1:2009cv00027
Plaintiff:
Tarent Bryant, James Peterson, Anthony Stepherson and others
Defendant:
Sonny Perdue, Karen Handel, James Donald and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Peterson et al v. Handel et al
as 5:2008cv00442
Plaintiff:
James Peterson
Defendant:
Sonny Perdue, Karen Handel, James Donald and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Peterson v. Perdue et al
as 1:2008cv00097
Plaintiff:
James Peterson
Defendant:
Sonny Perdue, James Donald, Wendi Thompson Squire and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Peterson v. State of Georgia
as 6:2008cv00047
Plaintiff:
Vincent Peterson
Defendant:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Neal v. Lukemire et al
as 5:2008cv00125
Plaintiff:
Willie Henry Neal, Jr.
Defendant:
Edward D. Lukemire, George F. Nunn, Jr., Katherine Lumsden and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jordan v CCA et al
as 4:2008cv00005
Plaintiff:
Leslie M Jordan
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America and Christopher Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peterson v. Upton et al
as 6:2007cv00059
Plaintiff:
James Peterson
Defendant:
Stephen Upton, John Brown, John W. Paul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
