Cases 61 - 70 of 170
Smith v. Missouri Board of Probation and Parole
as 4:2017cv00999
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lee Smith
Defendant:
Missouri Board of Probation and Parole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robertson v. State of Missouri et al
as 2:2017cv04042
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Robertson
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Board of Probation and Parole and Nathan Schroeder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Utter v. Lombardi et al
as 4:2017cv00169
Petitioner:
Samuel F. Utter
Respondent:
George Lombardi , Dean Minor and Missouri Board of Probation and Parole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole
as 4:2016cv01322
Petitioner:
Steven G Smith
Respondent:
Missouri Board of Probation & Parole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Watson v. Lombardi et al
as 2:2016cv00059
Plaintiff:
Terry G. Watson
Defendant:
George Lombardi and Missouri Board of Probation and Parole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robertson v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2016cv00963
Plaintiff:
Micheal Duane Robertson
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Board of Probation & Parole and Nathan Schroeder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. St. Louis County Circuit Court et al
as 4:2016cv00704
Plaintiff:
Adriane B. Jackson
Defendant:
St. Louis County Circuit Court, Pine Lawn Police Department, St. Louis County Justice Center Infirmary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peek v. Missouri Board of Probation and Parole et al
as 4:2016cv00498
Plaintiff:
James Peek
Defendant:
Missouri Board of Probation and Parole, 3 Member Parole Panel, Cynthia Kane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Smyth et al
as 4:2016cv00292
Petitioner:
Larry A White
Respondent:
Kelly Smyth and Missouri Board of Probation & Parole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bradin v. Bowersox et al
as 6:2015cv03525
Petitioner:
John Bradin
Respondent:
Michael Bowersox, Missouri Board of Probation & Parole, Corizon Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
