Cases 61 - 70 of 109
Robles v. Chapa et al
as 3:2015cv00123
Defendant:
Rachel Chapa and Dr. Lin
HSA:
Dr. Acosta
Plaintiff:
Luis Robles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carlucci v. Chapa
as 3:2015cv00120
Petitioner:
Gino Carlucci
Respondent:
Rachel Chapa
Notice Only Party:
Magdalena Jara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
John Wyatt v. Rachel Chapa, et al
as 15-50311
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN M. WYATT
Respondent - Appellee:
RACHEL CHAPA, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution La Tuna and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Wyatt v. Chapa
as 3:2015cv00028
Respondent:
Rachel Chapa
Notice Only Party:
Magdalena Jara
Petitioner:
John M. Wyatt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Robles v. Chapa
as 3:2014cv00457
Respondent:
Rachel Chapa
Notice Only Party:
Magdalena Jara
Petitioner:
Luis Robles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Price v. Chapa
as 3:2014cv00365
Defendant:
Rachel Chapa
Notice Only Party:
Jara Magdalena
Plaintiff:
Nicholas D. Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Torres-Marin v. Chapa
as 3:2014cv00363
Respondent:
Rachel Chapa
Notice Only Party:
Magdalena Jara
Petitioner:
Jose Torres-Marin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Laliberte v. Chapa
as 3:2014cv00311
Respondent:
Rachel Chapa
Notice Only Party:
Magdalena Jara
Petitioner:
Robert C. Laliberte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mark McQuitty v. Rachel Chapa
as 14-50771
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARK MCQUITTY
Respondent - Appellee:
RACHEL CHAPA, Warden, FCI La Tuna
Tiano v. Chapa
as 3:2014cv00261
Respondent:
Rachel Chapa
Notice Only Party:
Magdalena Jara
Petitioner:
Joshua Tiano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
