Cases 61 - 70 of 70
Rodriguez v. Pacholke
as 2:2007cv00382
Petitioner:
William Q Rodriguez
Respondent:
Dan Pacholke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez et al v. Clark
as 2:2007cv01601
Petitioner:
Carlos C Rodriguez
Respondent:
A Neil Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Diallo et al v. Mahr
as 3:2007cv05458
Plaintiff:
Mamadon Diallo, Domingo Macavila, Derrick Jason Borel and others
Defendant:
Theodore Mahr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Clark
as 2:2007cv01209
Petitioner:
Carlos Ceja Rodriguez
Respondent:
A Neil Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Camejo-Rodriguez
as 2:2007cv01241
Petitioner:
Louis Albert Camejo-Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rodriguez v. Palmquist et al
as 2:2007cv00640
Petitioner:
Rocky John Rodriguez
Respondent:
Robert J Palmquist, Robert E McFadden and Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
England v. Rodriguez et al
as 3:2007cv05181
Plaintiff:
Lester L England
Defendant:
Daniel J Rodriguez, John H Hill, Stephen C Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Mason et al
as 2:2007cv00105
Plaintiff:
Gregory Tyree Brown
Defendant:
Dean Mason, Gary Flemming, Debra Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Rodriguez
as 2:2007cv00081
Plaintiff:
Giovanni Walker
Defendant:
Willie Rodriguez, Kerri Adler and Grant County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez-Contreras v. Wigen et al
as 2:2007cv00078
Petitioner:
Juan Rodriguez-Contreras
Respondent:
George Wigen, Michael Melendez and Alberto Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
