Cases 61 - 70 of 1,566
Smith v. Gonzalis et al
as 3:2023cv50226
Plaintiff:
Matthew Michael Smith
Defendant:
Gonzalis, Hess, GEO Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dickerson v. Campbell et al
as 3:2023cv03203
Plaintiff:
Samuel Dickerson
Defendant:
Jack Campbell, B Loftus, Dan Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Campbell et al
as 3:2023cv03202
Plaintiff:
Navell White
Defendant:
Jack Campbell, Larry Beck, William Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv03521
Plaintiff:
Romell Young
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Chicago Police Department and Terry Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zampieri v. Disher et al
as 3:2023cv50203
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Allen Zampieri
Defendant:
Correctional Officer B. Disher and Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McArthur v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2023cv01790
Plaintiff:
Lucien McArthur
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Wexford Health Sources Inc, Doctor Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Jeffreys et al
as 1:2023cv01207
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Smith
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Leonta L Jackson, Debbie Knauer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Love v. Eddlemon et al
as 1:2023cv01202
Plaintiff:
George E Love
Defendant:
. Eddlemon, . Smith, C Hoffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fonville v. Campbell et al
as 3:2023cv03180
Plaintiff:
Michael Fonville
Defendant:
Jack Campbell, Larry Beck, William Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gray v. CTO-Smith et al
as 1:2023cv03151
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Gray
Defendant:
CTO-Smith, Lt. Powell, Warden Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
