Cases 61 - 70 of 70
Cunningham v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2009cv00197
Plaintiff:
Neally Cunningham
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Johnathan Mead, Kendell Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Shaw v. Barrow
as 7:2009cv00144
Petitioner:
Chad Shaw
Respondent:
Donald Barrow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marrero v. Hickey et al
as 2:2009cv00108
Petitioner:
Alex Marrero
Respondent:
Deborah Hickey, Anthony Haynes, J. Mead and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Shaw v. United States of America
as 1:2009cv01920
Petitioner:
Bryant E. Shaw
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Shaw v. Donald et al
as 5:2009cv00211
Plaintiff:
Dexter Shaw
Defendant:
James E Donald, Hilton Hall, Glenn Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Willis et al
as 5:2008cv00328
Plaintiff:
Chad Shaw
Defendant:
FNUK Willis and Steve Roberts
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Shaw v. Willis et al
as 1:2008cv00136
Plaintiff:
Chad Shaw
Defendant:
FNUK Willis and Steve Roberts
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Grier et al v. Hall, et al.
as 5:2008cv00177
Plaintiff:
Corey Grier, Christopher Russell, Patrick E. Cail and others
Defendant:
Hilton Hall and Mary Gore
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Abel v. Lappin et al
as 2:2007cv00088
Plaintiff:
Robert Keith Abel
Defendant:
Harley Lappin, Harrell Watts, Bethzadia H. Ricoff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hannor, et al v. Brinson, et al
as 6:1996cv00053
Plaintiff:
Bertram Hannor , Anthony Tucker , Willie Coleman and others
Defendant:
Nelson Brinson , Robert Yawn and Prison Health Services, Inc.
Movant:
Albert G. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
