Cases 61 - 70 of 14,703
Roderick Lockhart v. State of Florida
as 24-11350
Petitioner:
RODERICK D. LOCKHART
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Michael Mills v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11332
Petitioner:
MICHAEL ROGER MILLS
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Thomas v. State of Florida
as 9:2024cv80554
Plaintiff:
Johnny Thomas
Defendant:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KENON v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 4:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
CARLOS S KENON
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FARNEY vs STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 3:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
ADAM C FARNEY
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MacDonald v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Jason MacDonald
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, Attorney General and State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woolf v. Mclain et al
as 2:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
DJulino Exulus Woolf
Defendant:
Patrick Mclain, Reginal Counsel Office, Lee County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jamiel Jerrido v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11295
Petitioner:
JAMIEL JERRIDO
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Shaffer v. State of Florida
as 8:2024cv01013
Plaintiff:
Daniel C. Shaffer
Defendant:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00385
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
