Cases 61 - 70 of 91
Lawson v. Department of Justice et al
as 1:2014cv00576
Plaintiff:
Ronald Jerome Lawson
Defendant:
Department of Justice , Cellmate and USP Atwater Staff Members
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lawson v. Department of Justice et al
as 2:2014cv00912
Plaintiff:
Ronald Jerome Lawson
Defendant:
Department of Justice, Cellmate and USP Atwater
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mr. Alvin-Darrell Smith (RC) v. F.B.O.P.'S Charles E. Samuels Jr. et al
as 2:2014cv01713
Defendant:
(USP) Victorville Staff, C/O Arualla, C/O Arualla and others
RC:
Mr. Alvin-Darrell Smith
Bernaldez v. United States of America et al
as 3:2013cv03165
Plaintiff:
Lionel Bernaldez
Defendant:
United States of America, Bureau of Prisons, Metropolitan Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01914
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Hector Rodrigo Soto v. United States of America et al
as 8:2013cv01167
Respondent:
Immigration Customs Enforcement, United States of America and Warden, U.S. Bureau of Prisons USP Atwater, Atwater, California
Petitioner:
Hector Rodrigo Soto
Vionez v. Victorvill (USP) et al
as 4:2013cv03588
Plaintiff:
Juan Vionez
Defendant:
Victorvill (USP) and Dublin (FCI)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Messer v. USP Atwater Facilities Department et al
as 1:2013cv01032
Plaintiff:
Cecil Messer
Defendant:
USP Atwater Facilities Department, Mr. Mattson, Day and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Daly v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, Warden USP, Atwater
as 1:2013cv00958
Petitioner:
Joshua Robert Daly
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Warden USP, Atwater
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Muse v. USP Atwater, CA Staff Members
as 1:2013cv00100
Plaintiff:
Earl Muse
Defendant:
USP Atwater Staff , Mukgan , Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
