Cases 61 - 70 of 121
Walker v. Pavlakovic et al
as 4:2014cv00659
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Walker
Defendant:
David Pavlakovic, Michelle Snedeker and Mr. Wheat
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vanwagner v. Baldwin County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2014cv00639
Plaintiff:
John Edward Vanwagner
Defendant:
Baldwin County Sheriff's Office, Matthew Dean Stinson, Barlow and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Favors v. Thomas
as 5:2014cv00547
Plaintiff:
Norman Favors
Defendant:
Kim Thomas
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilkerson v. Carroll et al
as 7:2014cv00530
Plaintiff:
Antonio Wilkerson
Defendant:
Jennifer A. Carroll and ATEF
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hagood v. Morgan County Jail
as 5:2014cv00528
Plaintiff:
Rodney Hagood
Defendant:
Morgan County Jail
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McElroy v. Hutton
as 7:2014cv00500
Plaintiff:
Brent A McElroy
Defendant:
John Hutton
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fuller v. Pruitt et al
as 2:2014cv00438
Plaintiff:
David Boy Fuller
Defendant:
Omars Pruitt, Jeremy G Foster, Pope and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grundy v. Page et al
as 5:2014cv00251
Plaintiff:
Bobby J Grundy
Defendant:
Charles D Page, Jr and Robert M Baker
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Davenport et al
as 4:2014cv00240
Plaintiff:
Allan Williams
Defendant:
Carter Davenport, Kim Thomas, Robert Bentley and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pace v. Bentley et al
as 5:2014cv00218
Plaintiff:
Jason Lee Pace
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Kim Thomas, Carter and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
