Cases 71 - 80 of 1,886
Jackson v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv16927
Plaintiff:
Kelsey D Jackson
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Boutay, Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bohn v. Does et al
as 3:2023cv03949
Plaintiff:
Jonathan W. Bohn
Defendant:
Jane Does and Richard Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winston v. Shah et al
as 4:2023cv04224
Plaintiff:
Andre Winston
Defendant:
Viper Shah, . Savage, . Shawgo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stidwell v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv16672
Plaintiff:
Devon Stidwell
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart, Terry Hake, Shawn McCarthy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Cook County et al
as 1:2023cv16686
Plaintiff:
Patrick Johnson
Defendant:
Cook County, Sgt. Taylor, Laredo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dyson v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv16515
Plaintiff:
Stefannie Dyson
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Hollis, Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Magnotti v. Curran et al
as 4:2023cv04215
Plaintiff:
Angalo C Magnotti
Defendant:
Adam Curran, City of Spring Valley Illinois, Spring Valley Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rose v. Anderton et al
as 3:2023cv03799
Plaintiff:
Sean Rose
Defendant:
Khorey J. Anderton, Lieutenant McBride, Kay Lowery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. County Of Cook et al
as 1:2023cv16284
Plaintiff:
Tyrese Deon Coleman
Defendant:
County Of Cook, Thomas J. Dart, Amanda Gallegos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv03781
Plaintiff:
Robert Morris
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Taylor, Tara and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
