Cases 71 - 80 of 4,075
(PC)Harris v. Phillips et al
as 1:2023cv01713
Plaintiff:
Marvin Harris
Defendant:
B. D. Phillips, L. Delafuente, E. Espalin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Naim Ismail v. B. Birkholz
as 2:2023cv10393
Petitioner:
Naim Ismail
Respondent:
Warden B. Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
(PC) Sanchez v. Warden et al
as 1:2023cv01706
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Sanchez
Defendant:
Warden, B. Cates, Officer Murro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winslow v. Macomber et al
as 3:2023cv02270
Petitioner:
Kellen B. Winslow, II
Respondent:
Jeffery McComber and Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Goods v. Baughman et al
as 2:2023cv02790
Plaintiff:
Gregory Goods
Defendant:
David Baughman, C. Lacy, B. Scruggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Hammler v. Sacramento County et al
as 2:2023cv02778
Plaintiff:
Allen Hammler
Defendant:
Sacramento County, City of Represa, Rob Bonta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Johnson v. People of California
as 2:2023cv02715
Plaintiff:
Kevin B. Johnson
Defendant:
State of California and People of California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Francisco Melgar-Cabrera v. B. Lammer
as 5:2023cv02362
Petitioner:
Francisco Melgar-Cabrera
Respondent:
Warden B. Lammer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Johnson v. Unknown FBI Agents
as 2:2023cv02622
Plaintiff:
Kevin B. Johnson
Defendant:
Unknown FBI Agents
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv02319
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
