Cases 71 - 80 of 410
Brown v. Mallett
as 3:2020cv00156
Defendant:
Acting Director Jawarski Mallett
Plaintiff:
Stanley Titus Brown
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Davis
as 3:2020cv00075
Petitioner:
Jimmy T. Brown
Defendant:
Warden Josh Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lang et al v. Taylor et al
as 4:2020cv00030
Plaintiff:
Bobby Mitchell, Charlie Harris, Alexander Jones and others
Defendant:
Wendall Banks, Centurion of Mississippi, LLC, Brenda S. Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Magee City Jail et al
as 3:2020cv00099
Plaintiff:
Nicholas De'Juan Brown
Defendant:
Chief Randy Crawford and Magee City Jail
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Brown et al
as 5:2020cv00046
Plaintiff:
Sidney Chappel Nelson and Solo
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Unit Manager Katherine Brown and Warden Scott Middlebrooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watts v. Middlebrooks et al
as 5:2020cv00036
Defendant:
Warden Gabiel Walker, Captain Unknown Brown and Warden Scott Middlebrooks
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Albert James Watts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alexander et al v. Hall et al
as 4:2020cv00021
Defendant:
Tommy Taylor, Pelicia E. Hall and Marshal Turner
Plaintiff:
Benny Blansett, Steven Barnes, Darkeyus Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. State of Mississippi
as 4:2019cv00176
Petitioner:
John Brown
Respondent:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Perkins v. Middlebrooks et al
as 1:2019cv00916
Defendant:
Leddonna Evans, Rodrick Evans, Unknown Brown and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Melvin Lamar Perkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2019cv00850
Plaintiff:
John Brown
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
