Cases 71 - 80 of 128
Jackson v. Atkins
as 6:2017cv01966
Respondent:
Chuck E. Atkins
Petitioner:
Lowell Edward Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martin et al v. Clackamas County et al
as 3:2017cv01924
Defendant:
Christopher Barton, Clackamas County, Timothy Conger and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Singh v. Enriquez et al
as 2:2017cv01721
Defendant:
B. Amsberry, C. Babcock, H. Enriquez and others
Plaintiff:
Rotish V. Singh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson et al
as 3:2017cv01062
Defendant:
Aramark Food Services Inc., Bill Brady and Eddie Climmer
Plaintiff:
Lowell Edward Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00976
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Soria v. Jackson County Oregon Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2017cv00762
Defendant:
Cam, Clark, Huggs and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Alexander Soria
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nesbitt et al v. RVVCO et al
as 1:2017cv00209
Plaintiff:
Anthony Hernandez, Cody Markell and Lederrick Nesbitt
Defendant:
Jackson County Jail, Medford Police Department and RVVCO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Jergenson et al
as 2:2016cv02006
Defendant:
B. Akana, C. Bauer, Mr. Boman and others
Plaintiff:
Hunter Tyee Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. USA
as 3:2016cv01153
Petitioner:
Louis Eugene Jackson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Dickson v. Angelozzi et al
as 3:2016cv01089
Defendant:
Rick Angelozzi, Bristol, C/O Elgin and others
Plaintiff:
Jack Gene Dickson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
