Cases 71 - 80 of 105
OUELLETTE v. ANDROSCOGGIN COUNTY JAIL et al
as 2:2013cv00051
Plaintiff:
DANIEL A OUELLETTE
Defendant:
GUY DESJARDINS, JOHN LEBEL, JEFFREY CHUTE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WESTERMAN et al v. COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND MAINE et al
as 2:2013cv00014
Plaintiff:
JESSE WESTERMAN and BRENDAN COLLINS
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND MAINE, KEVIN JOYCE, FRANCINE BRETON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DEMOS v. U S SECRETARY OF DEFENSE
as 1:2012cv00407
Plaintiff:
JOHN R DEMOS
Defendant:
U S SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, BARACK OBAMA, HILLARY CLINTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRAY v. BARNHART
as 1:2012cv00373
Petitioner:
JOHN GRAY
Respondent:
PATRICIA BARNHART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WITHALL v. SOMERSET COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2012cv00367
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER ALLEN WITHALL
Defendant:
SOMERSET COUNTY JAIL, COREY SWOPE, STEPHEN GIGGEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WIDI v. MCNEIL et al
as 2:2012cv00188
Plaintiff:
DAVID J WIDI, JR
Defendant:
PAUL MCNEIL, STEPHEN E HICKEY, JR, CHRISTOPHER J DURKIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ERICSON v. MAGNUSSON et al
as 2:2012cv00178
Plaintiff:
ERIC ERICSON
Defendant:
MARTIN MAGNUSSON, JOSEPH PONTE, PATRICIA BARNHART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROLLINS v. HACKET et al
as 2:2012cv00126
Plaintiff:
LARRY DEAN ROLLINS
Defendant:
HACKET, LINDA WENTWORTH, BAILY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRIFFIN et al v. DOE et al
as 2:2012cv00121
Plaintiff:
GARRETT GRIFFIN
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, KELLER and FRANCENE BRENTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LANDRY v. BARNHART et al
as 1:2012cv00016
Plaintiff:
GERARD LANDRY
Defendant:
PATRICIA BARNHART, JOHN DOE and JOSEPH PONTE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
