Cases 71 - 80 of 203
Brown v. Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
as 2:2019oe05528
Petitioner:
Milous Brown
Respondent:
Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brown v. Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
as 2:2019cv05485
Petitioner:
Milous Brown
Respondent:
Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hawkins v. Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
as 2:2019cv05183
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Hawkins
Respondent:
Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kurtz v. Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
as 2:2019cv05186
Petitioner:
Kyle Kurtz
Respondent:
Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Willard v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction et al
as 2:2019cv04959
Plaintiff:
Christopher Willard
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution and Doctor Eddy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunt v. Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
as 2:2019cv04465
Petitioner:
Chad Hunt, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Genous v. Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
as 2:2019cv03742
Respondent:
Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
Petitioner:
Connie L. Genous
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Weir v. Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
as 2:2019cv03494
Petitioner:
Kevin A. Weir
Respondent:
Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(PC) Belmonte v. Winkfield et al
as 2:2019cv01189
Defendant:
- Decker, Pendleton, Winkfield and others
Plaintiff:
Miguel Belmonte
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
as 2:2019cv02415
Petitioner:
Kevin D. Dixon
Respondent:
Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
