Cases 71 - 80 of 309
Watson v. Maryland Dept. of Health et al
as 1:2021cv01097
Defendant:
John Doe, Worcester County Detention Center and Maryland Dept. of Health
Plaintiff:
David Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
v. Wise et al
as 1:2021cv00828
Defendant:
C. Henderson and John Doe
Plaintiff:
Darryl K. Wise
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Hanna v. Hills et al
as 1:2021cv00684
Defendant:
John Doe, Wayne Hills, Nicholas Daniels and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Hanna
Interested Party:
Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv
Allen v. Hendricks et al
as 1:2021cv00650
Defendant:
Sgt. Doe, Officer Jegede, Officer Maurry and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Beckwitt v. Smith et al
as 1:2021cv00578
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lewis Beckwitt
Defendant:
Michele Smith, A non-zero quantity of John Doe Judge(s) for the Circuit Court of Montgomery County, MD and An unknown quantity of John Doe defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Hinton v. Acuff et al
as 1:2021cv00570
Defendant:
Ronald Ragland, Jama Acuff, Sgt. Corr. Officer Price and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Hinton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Wise v. Doe et al
as 1:2021cv00473
Defendant:
CO II John Doe, Jessup Correctional Institution (JCI) and John Doe
Plaintiff:
Darryl K. Wise
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Burkins v. Corizon Resident Agent
as 1:2021cv00244
Plaintiff:
William Burkins
Defendant:
Corizon Resident Agent, Jane Doe Scheduler, NP Clarice Aryiku and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Hall v. West et al
as 1:2021cv00169
Plaintiff:
Harvey Hall
Defendant:
Chief of Security Brittingham, John Doe, Derr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Mills v. Hogan et al
as 1:2020cv03767
Defendant:
Officer Dorcan, Robin Woolford, Lt. Sawyers and others
Plaintiff:
Albert Curtis Mills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
