Cases 71 - 80 of 111
Hunter v. McKune, et al
as 08-3184
Petitioner - Appellant:
DELARICK HUNTER
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID R. MCKUNE, Warden and STEPHEN N. SIX, Kansas Attorney General
Martin v. McKune, et al
as 08-3178
Petitioner - Appellant:
FREDERICK MARTIN
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID R. MCKUNE, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF KANSAS
Cook v. McKune, et al
as 08-3156
Petitioner - Appellant:
KENNETH M. COOK
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID R. MCKUNE, Warden, Warden, Lansing Correctional Facility and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF KANSAS
Murnahan v. McKune et al
as 5:2008cv03136
Petitioner:
Robert Erric Murnahan
Respondent:
David R. McKune, Kansas Parole Board and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Showalter v. McKune, et al
as 08-3116
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARC SHOWALTER
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID R. MCKUNE, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF KANSAS
Edmisten v. State of Kansas et al
as 5:2008cv03091
Plaintiff:
Jonathan J. Edmisten
Defendant:
State of Kansas, Kathleen Sebelius, Roger Werholtz and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Booher v. Kansas Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2008cv03056
Plaintiff:
Daryl S Booher
Defendant:
Kansas Department of Corrections, Roger Werholtz, David R. McKune and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schmitt v. Rice et al
as 5:2008cv03047
Plaintiff:
Ronald J. Schmitt
Defendant:
Elizabeth Rice , David R. McKune , Roger Werholtz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deiterman v. State of Kansas, et al
as 08-3031
Petitioner - Appellant:
FRANK DEITERMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF KANSAS, ROGER WERHOLTZ, Secretary of Corrections, DAVID R. MCKUNE, Warden, Warden, Lansing Correctional Facility and others
Jones v. McKune et al
as 5:2008cv03042
Petitioner:
Jeffrey L Jones
Respondent:
David R. McKune and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
