Cases 71 - 80 of 1,351
Mills v. Broomfield et al
as 4:2022cv05126
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Mills
Defendant:
Ron Broomfield, Ralph Diaz, Ronald Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Raymond Diaz Jr. v. State of California
as 2:2022cv06478
Petitioner:
Raymond Diaz, Jr.
Respondent:
State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kenneth Morgan v. S. Bermudez et al
as 2:2022cv06294
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Morgan
Defendant:
S. Bermudez, V. Diaz, A. Arredondo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saif'ullah v. Allison et al
as 3:2022cv05017
Plaintiff:
Khalifah E.D. Saif'ullah and Fernando Jackson
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison, Ralph Diaz, Ronald Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Diaz-Lozano v. Trate
as 1:2022cv01027
Petitioner:
Fausto Diaz-Lozano
Respondent:
B. M. Trate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Watson v. Allison et al
as 5:2022cv04522
Plaintiff:
Rhone Watson
Defendant:
CDCR, CCHCS, San Quentin State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. Newsome et al
as 4:2022cv04482
Plaintiff:
Arthur Duane Jackson
Defendant:
Mayor Gavin Newsome, Ron Davis, Ron Broomfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jason Latrell Thomas v. G. Marhsall et al
as 2:2022cv05446
Plaintiff:
Jason Latrell Thomas
Defendant:
G. Marshall, J. Villa, G. Ortega and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brian Diaz v. Birkholz
as 2:2022cv05144
Petitioner:
Brian Diaz
Respondent:
Warden Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
(PC) Hammler v. Johnson et al
as 2:2022cv01252
Plaintiff:
Allen Hammler
Defendant:
Regina Johnson, M. Burkhart, Matthew McGiffen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
