Cases 71 - 80 of 228
CLAYTON v. GOODMAN et al
as 5:2021cv00310
Plaintiff:
EARNEST BARNARD CLAYTON
Defendant:
CO2 BRANDON GOODMAN, UNIT MANAGER BARBARA CUMMING, Warden WALTER BERRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diarra v. Dekalb County Public Defender Office, Director et al
as 1:2021cv03293
Plaintiff:
Moussa Diarra
Defendant:
Dekalb County Public Defender Office, Director and Attorney Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Diarra v. Maddox et al
as 1:2021cv02882
Plaintiff:
Moussa Diarra
Defendant:
Melody M. Maddox, Dekalb County Inmate Classificatio, Dekalb County Custodian of Records and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terrell v. Caldwell et al
as 3:2021cv00042
Plaintiff:
Marcus Anthony Terrell
Defendant:
Warden Antonio Caldwell, Medical Mental Health Counselors, Ms. Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HART v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 1:2021cv00120
Defendant:
WARDEN STEADLEY
Respondent:
PHYSICIANS ASSISTANT EDWARDS, LT INGRAM, DEPUTY WARDEN PEOPLES and others
Petitioner:
JONATHAN ANDREW HART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
KING v. AIKENS et al
as 5:2021cv00215
Defendant:
DOCTOR AIKENS, DOCTOR LANE ULRICH and MEDICAL DIRECTOR JENNIFER MASON
Plaintiff:
EDDIE JAMES KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00106
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Diarra v. Maddox et al
as 1:2021cv01919
Defendant:
Randy Akies, Lieutenant Graham, Melody M. Maddox and others
Plaintiff:
Moussa Diarra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plunkett v. Fulton County Sheriff et al
as 1:2021cv01863
Defendant:
Jail Medical Staff Does, Jail Dental Staff Does, Chief Jailer Jackson and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Christopher Plunkett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
