Cases 71 - 80 of 90
Gamble v. Kentucky Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2013cv00317
Plaintiff:
Bennie L. Gamble, Jr.
Defendant:
Kentucky Department of Corrections, Don Bottom, Jack Conway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gamble v. Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 5:2013cv00308
Plaintiff:
Bennie L. Gamble, Jr.
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, Corrections Corporation of America, Kentucky Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gamble v. Bottom et al
as 5:2013cv00270
Petitioner:
Bennie L. Gamble, Jr.
Respondent:
Don Bottom, Kentucky Department of Corrections and Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sizemore v. Bottom
as 1:2013cv00114
Petitioner:
Randall Lee Sizemore
Defendant:
Don Bottom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Turley v. Bottom
as 5:2013cv00230
Petitioner:
James Richard Turley
Respondent:
Don Bottom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
King v. Bottoms et al
as 5:2013cv00229
Petitioner:
Jamell M. King
Respondent:
Don Bottoms, Fayette County Department of Corrections and Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dickerson v. Bottom
as 5:2013cv00117
Petitioner:
Robert A. Dickerson
Respondent:
Don Bottom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Taylor v. Bottom
as 1:2013cv00091
Petitioner:
Michael L. Taylor
Respondent:
Don Bottom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gamble v. Bottom
as 5:2013cv00052
Petitioner:
Bennie L. Gamble, Jr.
Defendant:
Don Bottom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eads v. Bottoms
as 6:2013cv00029
Petitioner:
George Everly Eads
Respondent:
Don Bottom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
