Cases 71 - 80 of 159
Damel Jeffries v. Los Angeles Sheriff Department et al
as 2:2017cv00424
Plaintiff:
Damel Jeffries
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and Los Angeles Sheriff Department
Nathan Javan Ross v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2016cv09049
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Correctional Officer John Doe 1, Correctional Officer John Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan Javan Ross
Kory Armes v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2016cv08820
Plaintiff:
Kory Armes
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Anthony Kurtis Wilson v. Jim McDonell et al
as 2:2016cv07698
Defendant:
Deputy Sheriff John Doe 1, Deputy Sheriff John Doe 2, Deputy Sheriff John Doe 3 and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Kurtis Wilson
Robert Lee Billie v. Bill Brown et al
as 2:2016cv07663
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Billie
Defendant:
Bill Brown, Under Sheriff John Doe 1, Jail Commander John Doe 2 and others
Michael Damone Allen v. Jim McDonnell et al
as 2:2016cv06893
Plaintiff:
Michael Damone Allen
Defendant:
Jane Doe 4, Jane Doe 4, John Doe 1 and others
Pennings v. San Diego Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2016cv02318
Plaintiff:
Otoniel Tyler Pennings
Defendant:
San Diego Sheriff's Department, Barrera, Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muse v. Riggins et al
as 3:2016cv01721
Plaintiff:
Eric James Muse
Defendant:
James Riggins, Ring, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Euzle Jacques v. McDonald et al
as 2:2016cv03599
Defendant:
Sheriff Adeppa, Sheriff Hadnot, Sheriff John Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Euzel Jacques
Christopher Hayes v. John Doe 1 et al
as 2:2016cv03625
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hayes
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
