Cases 71 - 80 of 1,927
Anderson v. Danila et al
as 1:2023cv00302
Plaintiff:
Ronald Anderson
Defendant:
FNU Danila, FNU Roless, FNU Jinkings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. The United States of America
as 4:2023cv03655
Petitioner:
Christopher Jones
Respondent:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jones v. Dallas County Hospital District- Parkland Police Department
as 3:2023cv01839
Plaintiff:
Hiireen Azizi Jones
Defendant:
Dallas County Hospital District- Parkland Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2023cv01776
Petitioner:
Rodolfo King Jones
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Parkland Hospital et al
as 3:2023cv01649
Plaintiff:
Hiireen A Jones
Defendant:
Parkland Hospital and FNU Daya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01868
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Stevens et al
as 1:2023cv00336
Plaintiff:
Keithus Jones
Defendant:
John B Stevens, Jr, Bob Wortham, Mike Laird and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. District Attorney's Office et al
as 4:2023cv03298
Plaintiff:
James H Jones
Defendant:
District Attorney's Office and Methodist Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant II v. Officer Elizondo et al
as 9:2023cv00135
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Bryant II
Defendant:
Officer Elizondo, Officer Jones, Officer Hallmark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. Jones
as 5:2023cv00909
Plaintiff:
Daniel Keith Martinez
Defendant:
Bourbon Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
