Cases 71 - 80 of 143
Trevino v. Lopez et al
as 1:2010cv00255
Petitioner:
Humberto Trevino
Respondent:
Antonio Lopez, Janet Napolitano, Hillary R. Clinton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Verdejo Rodcha et al v. Landgrebe et al
as 9:2010cv00144
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Verdejo Rodcha
Defendant:
Kenneth Landgrebe, Janet Napolitano, John Malcolm Bales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Blair v. Napolitano et al
as 5:2010cv00758
Petitioner:
Robert Blair
Respondent:
Gary Gomez, Eric Holder, Julie L. Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Benavides v. Napolitano et al
as 7:2010cv00377
Petitioner:
Miguel Angel Benavides
Defendant:
Janet Napolitano, Hillary Rodham Clinton and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
More v. Holder et al
as 4:2010cv03169
Plaintiff:
Joshua Odhiambo Moro
Respondent:
Eric Holder, Jr , Janet Napolitano and Kenneth Landgrebe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Amin v. Holder et al
as 4:2010cv03164
Petitioner:
Mohammad Amin
Respondent:
Eric H Holder, Janet Napolitano and Kenneth Landgrebe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
James v. Noriega et al DO NOT DOCKET IN 1:10CV204. CASE IS CONSOLIDATED UNDER 1:10CV203
as 1:2010cv00204
Petitioner:
Kemar R James
Respondent:
Noriega , De La Fuentes , DHS/ICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Achaval v. Holder et al
as 5:2010cv00720
Petitioner:
Mario O. Achaval
Respondent:
Warden Gary Gomez, Eric Holder, Julie L. Mayers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Zarate v. Holder et al
as 1:2010cv00194
Petitioner:
Jose Zarate
Respondent:
Eric Holder, Janet Napolitano, Nuria Prendes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Han v. Holder et al
as 4:2010cv02534
Petitioner:
Toeu Han
Respondent:
Eric H Holder, Janet Napolitano and Kenneth Landgrebe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
