Cases 71 - 80 of 352
Avramham v. Doe
as 1:2021cv00251
Plaintiff:
Moshe Avramham and Marvin Arnold Pollack
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matzell v. Annucci et al
as 9:2020cv01605
Defendant:
Elizabeth Laramay, Jane Boyea, Jeffrey McKoy and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Matzell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Uhler et al
as 9:2020cv01482
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Harris
Defendant:
Sturegon, Superintendent Uhler, Schroyes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corey v. Broome County Correctional Facility et al
as 9:2020cv01457
Defendant:
David Harden, Mark Smloinsky, Broome County Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff:
Bruce R. Corey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matzell v. Annucci et al
as 1:2020cv09963
Defendant:
Elizabeth Laramay, Jane Boyea, Jeffrey McKoy and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Matzell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corey v. Broome County Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2020cv09731
Defendant:
David Harden, Mark Smloinsky, Broome County Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff:
Bruce R. Corey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dupigny v. John/Jane Doe
as 1:2020cv09359
Plaintiff:
Hubert Dupigny
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mohammad v. Capra
as 9:2020cv01309
Respondent:
John/Jane Doe and Michael Capra
Petitioner:
Abdullah Abdul Hakeem Mohammad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Genao v. City of New York et al
as 1:2020cv08722
Plaintiff:
Gabino Genao
Defendant:
City of New York, Stukes, MDC Deputy of Secuty Shannon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Giles et al v. Toulon Jr. Ed.D et al
as 1:2020cv03875
Plaintiff:
Isiah Ramos, Alexander Dixon, William Deppisch and others
Defendant:
Sergeants John & Jane Doe, Governor Cuomo, Correction Officer John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
