Cases 71 - 80 of 94
Johnson v. CERT (MCT) a.k.a Black Team et al
as 3:2013cv00980
Plaintiff:
Marcus J. Johnson
Defendant:
Unknown Wimdal , John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. CERT (MCT) a.k.a Black Team et al
as 4:2012cv00175
Plaintiff:
Marcus J. Johnson
Defendant:
CERT (MCT) a.k.a Black Team, Unknown Dykes, Unknown Wimdal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vance v. GEO et al
as 4:2012cv00142
Plaintiff:
Frederick Lashawn Vance
Defendant:
GEO, John Does 1-3, Unknown Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Laurent v. GEO Group Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv00075
Plaintiff:
Leo L. Laurent
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc., Unknown Horton, Unknown Grimes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schwindling v. Pennington et al
as 3:2011cv00353
Plaintiff:
George Ameil Schwindling
Defendant:
Ronnie Pennington, Brian Bailey, Ronnie Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stern v. Epps et al
as 3:2011cv00319
Plaintiff:
James H. Stern
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps, Margaret Bingham, Eddie Cates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. 2255 Haley Barbour Parkway et al
as 5:2011cv00047
Plaintiff:
Michael Thomas
Defendant:
2255 Haley Barbour Parkway, John Does 1-50 and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Banks v. 2255 Haley Barbour Parkway et al
as 5:2011cv00048
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
2255 Haley Barbour Parkway, John Does 1-50 and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Anderson v. Jackson County et al
as 1:2011cv00067
Plaintiff:
Milton Thomas Anderson
Defendant:
Jackson County, Ken Broadus and John Does 1-6
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Redmond v. Baty et al
as 3:2010cv00635
Plaintiff:
Dicky Wayne Redmond
Defendant:
Shane Baty, John Doe, #1, Unknown McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
