Cases 71 - 80 of 1,247
Kelly v. Gates et al
as 4:2022cv03451
Plaintiff:
James Carl Kelly
Defendant:
S. Gates, S. Sawyer, M. Villanueva and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. Atenley et al
as 3:2022cv03032
Petitioner:
James Carl Kelly
Respondent:
Warden Atenley, Doctor Michael Yeh, Doctor Lara Danils and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Kelly v. Atenly et al
as 4:2022cv02915
Plaintiff:
James Carl Kelly
Defendant:
Atenly, T. Allen, T. Foss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. Allen et al
as 4:2022cv02719
Plaintiff:
James Carl Kelly
Defendant:
T. Allen, Atenley, Lemon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Davis v. Kelly et al
as 2:2022cv00773
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Davis
Defendant:
K. Kelly, M. Ashe and San Joaquin Medical Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Barnes et al
as 3:2022cv00641
Plaintiff:
Isaac Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Don Barnes, William Gore, Kenneth K. So and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. Warden of Salinas Valley State Prison et al
as 4:2022cv02647
Plaintiff:
James Carl Kelly
Defendant:
Warden of Salinas Valley State Prison and Doctor Lara Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Barnes et al
as 3:2022cv00621
Plaintiff:
Isaac Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Don Barnes, William Gore, Kenneth K. So and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 bv Fed. Question: Bivens-Prisoner
Kelly v. San Mateo County Board of Supervisors et al
as 4:2022cv02519
Plaintiff:
Khalil Alexander Kelly
Defendant:
San Mateo County Board of Supervisors, Dave Pine, Carole Groom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Hickman v. Santoro
as 1:2022cv00450
Plaintiff:
William Vertel Hickman
Defendant:
Kelly Santoro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
