Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Tennessee
Cases 71 - 80 of 106
Hickman et al v. Helton et al
as 1:2014cv00162
Plaintiff: James Ronald Hickman and Anthony Len Peden
Defendant: Kyle Helton, Giles County Jail, Teresa Mattox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Moore et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv02778
Plaintiff: Armando Q. Anderson
Defendant: Robert Moore, Oldham, Haselett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanders v. USA
as 1:2014cv00108
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Kelly Sanders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Sharp v. McCoig et al (TVV)
as 3:2014cv00045
Plaintiff: Gary O Sharp
Defendant: G W McCoig, Kelly, Winstead and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conaser v. Lester et al
as 2:2013cv02797
Plaintiff: Jim George Conaser
Defendant: Jerry Lester, Ronald Donald Willie, Kelly Conrade and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelly v. Donahue et al
as 2:2013cv02676
Petitioner: Albert Kelly
Respondent: Michael Donahue and State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Murff v. Corizon Medical Providers Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv02581
Plaintiff: Anthony Murff
Defendant: Corizon Medical Providers Inc., O. Campbell, David Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. United States of America et al
as 1:2013cv01182
Plaintiff: Marcus Bernel Kelly
Defendant: United States of America, J. Daniel Breen and James W. Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Timmons v. Shelby County et al
as 2:2013cv02239
Plaintiff: Michael Timmons
Defendant: Shelby County, William Oldham, Robert L. Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kelly v. Moose et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv01339
Plaintiff: Dekota Kelly
Defendant: James Moose and Wayne Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?