Cases 71 - 80 of 176
DAVIS v. RICCI et al
as 2:2009cv02768
Petitioner:
EDWARD JAMAL DAVIS
Respondent:
MICHELLE R. RICCI and ANN MILGRAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Phillip Wood v. State of NJ, et al
as 09-2176
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PHILLIP WOOD
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NJ and MICHELLE R. RICCI
Joseph Austin v. Michelle Ricci, et al
as 09-2124
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH T. AUSTIN
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHELLE R. RICCI and ANNE MILGRAM, Attorney General of the State of NJ
THOMPSON v. HAYMAN et al
as 3:2009cv01833
Plaintiff:
RICHARD THOMPSON
Defendant:
GEORGE HAYMAN, MICHELLE R. RICCI, L. JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Arthur Ellison v. Michelle Ricci, et al
as 09-2085
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARTHUR LEE ELLISON
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHELLE R. RICCI and ATTY GEN NJ
WILLIAMS v. RICCI et al
as 2:2009cv01822
Petitioner:
JERMAINE A. WILLIAMS
Respondent:
MICHELLE R. RICCI and ANNE MILGRAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ANDERSON v. RICCI et al
as 2:2009cv01168
Petitioner:
MAURICE ANDERSON
Respondent:
MICHELLE R. RICCI and ANNE MILGRAM
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
HAMILTON v. RICCI et al
as 3:2009cv00795
Plaintiff:
ANDREW M.A. HAMILTON
Defendant:
MICHELLE R. RICCI and MICHELLE WARREN HAMMEL
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BORETSKY v. RICCI et al
as 3:2009cv00771
Petitioner:
BORIS BORETSKY
Respondent:
MICHELLE R. RICCI and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ANNE MILGRAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frederick Hedgespeth v. Roy Hendricks, et al
as 09-1314
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK HEDGESPETH
Defendant - Appellee:
ROY L. HENDRICKS, former Administrator of New Jersey State Prison, RICHARD RUNCIE, former Chief of Custody at New Jersey State Prison, WASHINGTON, Lieutenant, New Jersey Department of Corrections and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
