Cases 71 - 80 of 143
Brooks v. Medina et al
as 1:2013cv02213
Plaintiff:
Keith Clayton Brooks, Jr.
Defendant:
Angel Medina, Angel (I) Medina, David Gabriel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Medina v. Doe et al
as 1:2013cv01936
Plaintiff:
Ernest Medina
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 cc Religious Land Use & Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000
Medina v. Goodrich et al
as 1:2013cv01898
Petitioner:
Ernest J. Medina
Respondent:
Barry Goodrich
Plaintiff:
Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Medina v. Goodrich et al
as 1:2013cv01879
Petitioner:
Ernest J. Medina
Respondent:
Barry Goodrich and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Medina v. Weber
as 1:2013cv01066
Plaintiff:
Alan Ambrose Medina
Defendant:
Dawn Weber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abdullah v. Berkebile et al
as 1:2013cv00732
Plaintiff:
Imam-Muhammad Abdullah
Defendant:
Berkebile, Kuda, Cassel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Lomax v. Trani et al
as 1:2013cv00707
Plaintiff:
Arthur James Lomax
Defendant:
Travis Trani, Angel Medina, Steve Hartley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DePineda v. Medina
as 1:2013cv00152
Petitioner:
Manuel DePineda
Respondent:
Angel Medina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gandy v. Clements et al
as 1:2012cv03331
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Gandy
Defendant:
Tom Clements, Steve Smith, Jerry Barber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bachofer v. Creany et al
as 1:2012cv03254
Plaintiff:
Baruch Bachofer
Defendant:
Timothy Creany Jr. , Paula Frantz, Klenke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
