Cases 71 - 80 of 298
Johnson v. Lee et al
as 9:2019cv01075
Defendant:
Moore, William Lee, H. Eigo and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Lee
as 6:2019cv06632
Petitioner:
Richard Moore
Respondent:
William Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Baxter v. Piccolo et al
as 6:2019cv06637
Defendant:
Timothy Heath, L. Butler, Peter Schmitt and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Baxter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. City of Yonkers et al
as 1:2019cv07340
Plaintiff:
Jordan L. Moore
Defendant:
Police Officer John Doe, Detective John Doe #2, Police Officer Moran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Lee
as 9:2019cv00880
Petitioner:
Richard Moore
Respondent:
William Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Turner v. Kelly et al
as 1:2019cv06529
Plaintiff:
Wilbert K.A. Turner
Defendant:
City of Stamford CT, Det. Erin Moore, Chief John Fontaneali and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davison v. Bunce et al
as 9:2019cv00653
Defendant:
R. Purlier, Rocque (Female), R. Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Darnell Davison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. The Superintendent of Cayuga Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2019cv03384
Respondent:
The Superintendent of Cayuga Correctional Facility, Nassau County District Attorney Office, Michael John Meenan and others
Petitioner:
Gary H. Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Moore v. Mansueto et al
as 9:2019cv00624
Defendant:
John Doe 3, John Doe 2, John Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoey v. County of New York et al
as 1:2019cv04470
Defendant:
Lawrence Hale Newman, Audrey S. Moore, Esq., Cyrus R. Vance, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hoey, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
