Cases 71 - 80 of 327
GREEN v. AVILES et al
as 2:2022cv03140
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY J. GREEN
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILES and NURSE WINT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YOUNGER v. AVILES et al
as 2:2022cv03023
Plaintiff:
JASHAWN YOUNGER
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILES and NURSE WINT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BEY v. AVILES et al
as 2:2022cv03024
Plaintiff:
MUHAMIN BEY
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILES and NURSE WINT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARROW v. AVILES et al
as 2:2022cv02296
Plaintiff:
VONTRA MARROW
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILES and NURSE WINT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRUZ v. AVILES et al
as 2:2022cv00704
Plaintiff:
JOSE CRUZ
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILES and NURSE WINT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DENNIS v. AVILES et al
as 2:2022cv00615
Plaintiff:
JOHN K. DENNIS
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILES and NURSE WINT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DEVAULT v. WARREN et al
as 1:2022cv00492
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN DEVAULT
Defendant:
CHARLES WARREN, OSCAR AVILES and EVELYN OLSEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUSCH v. HUDSON COUNTY
as 2:2017cv01479
Plaintiff:
JOHN RUSCH
Defendant:
HUDSON COUNTY, OSCAR AVILES, KIRK EADY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Szentkiralyi v. Aviles et al
as 1:2017cv00949
Petitioner:
Krisztina R. Szentkiralyi
Respondent:
Oscar Aviles, Raymond Simonse, Jeh Johnson and others
Defendant:
Loretta Lynch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Arias v. Aviles
as 16-3186
Petitioner - Appellee:
Juan Gutierrez Arias
Respondent - Appellant:
Warden Oscar Aviles, in his official capacity as Warden of Hudson County Jail, Christopher Shanahan, in his official capacity as New York Field Office Director for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Secretary Jeh Johnson, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Homeland Security and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
