Cases 71 - 80 of 126
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00179
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Smalls v. State Board of Pardons and Paroles et al
as 4:2014cv00031
Plaintiff:
George Smalls
Defendant:
State Board of Pardons and Paroles, Georgia Dept. of Corrections, Chatham County Sheriffs Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. State Board of Pardons and Paroles et al
as 1:2013cv04276
Plaintiff:
Robert Hill
Defendant:
State Board of Pardons and Paroles, James E. Donald, Albert R. Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gerald Miller v. Warden, et al
as 13-13105
Petitioner - Appellant:
GERALD HENDRICK MILLER
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN and STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES
Mathis v. Georgia State Board of Pardons And Paroles et al
as 1:2013cv01863
Plaintiff:
Gerald Wayne Mathis
Defendant:
Georgia State Board of Pardons And Paroles and James Donald
NELMS v. STATE BOARD OF PARDON AND PAROLE et al
as 5:2013cv00167
Plaintiff:
JOHN NELMS
Defendant:
STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES and THURMAN L HENDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spencer v. Bigelow et al
as 2:2013cv00334
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Keith Spencer
Respondent:
R. Bigelow, Utah State Board of Pardons and Parole, Clark A. Harms and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gerald Miller v. Warden, et al
as 13-10235
Petitioner - Appellant:
GERALD HENDRICK MILLER
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN and STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES
Edward Barber v. GA Dept. of Law, et al
as 12-15721
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD BARBER
Defendant - Appellee:
GA DEPT. OF LAW, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Hamilton v. State Board of Pardons and Paroles
as 1:2012cv03745
Plaintiff:
Roland Paul Hamilton
Defendant:
State Board of Pardons and Paroles
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
