Cases 71 - 80 of 194
OREN v. HARRY et al
as 2:2016cv03896
Petitioner:
ARIE OREN
Respondent:
LAUREL HARRY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cook v. The County of Montgomery et al
as 9:2016cv00800
Plaintiff:
Ryan Cook
Defendant:
The County of Montgomery, Michael Amato, Michael Franko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLYBURN v. GORDON et al
as 2:2016cv03536
Petitioner:
ANNE L. CLYBURN
Respondent:
MICHAEL P. GORDON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
EDWARDS v. SOMMERS
as 2:2016cv02826
Petitioner:
KELVIN J. EDWARDS
Respondent:
JOHN SOMMERS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MUIR v. LINK et al
as 2:2016cv02256
Petitioner:
JOEL GLASTON MUIR
Respondent:
CYNTHIA LINK, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SPENCE v. WENEROWICZ et al
as 2:2016cv01931
Petitioner:
SIMEONE SPENCE
Respondent:
MICHAEL WENEROWICZ, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
VALLE v. SUPERINTENDENT OF DALLAS et al
as 2:2016cv01811
Petitioner:
ANTONIO S. VALLE
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT OF DALLAS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY CO, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF JOHN TOWNSON DICKERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-11398
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
PERKINS v. MAHALLY et al
as 2:2016cv00763
Petitioner:
WILLIAM PERKINS
Respondent:
LAWRENCE MAHALLY , THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
OLIVER v. TICE et al
as 2:2016cv00677
Petitioner:
ANTHONY EDWARD OLIVER
Respondent:
ERIC TICE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
