Cases 71 - 80 of 920
Swan v. Oklahoma City Police Department et al
as 5:2022cv00778
Plaintiff:
John Miguel Swan
Defendant:
Oklahoma City Police Department and State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Green v State of Oklahoma
as 5:2022cv00722
Petitioner:
Steve O'Neal Green
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nero v. Governor of Oklahoma et al
as 5:2022cv00687
Plaintiff:
Demetrious Scott Nero
Defendant:
Governor of Oklahoma and Attorney General State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Green v State of Oklahoma
as 4:2022cv00344
Petitioner:
Steve Oneal Green
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nero v. State of Oklahoma
as 22-6121
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEMETRIOUS SCOTT NERO
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA
Clark v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2022cv00303
Plaintiff:
David George Clark
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, Oklahoma Department of Corrections and Tulsa County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2022cv00304
Plaintiff:
David George Clark
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Tulsa County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rhodes v. State of Oklahoma
as 4:2022cv00293
Petitioner:
Jerry Don Rhodes
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McAfee v. United States of America et al
as 5:2022cv00570
Plaintiff:
Marcus Tyree Lashawn McAfee
Defendant:
United States of America, State of Oklahoma, Jessica Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maxwell v. State of Oklahoma Attorney General et al
as 5:2022cv00475
Plaintiff:
James Henry Maxwell, Jr and S Claus
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma Attorney General and Wagoner County Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
