Cases 71 - 80 of 515
Quiles v. Upton et al
as 3:2023cv03383
Plaintiff:
Mark Quiles
Defendant:
Mr. J. Upton, Kimberly Weitl and Anthony Wills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thurman v. Wills et al
as 3:2023cv03369
Plaintiff:
Donnelle Thurman
Defendant:
Anthony D. Wills and Tact Team Members
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mohammed Abuharba v. Craig Asselmeier, et al
as 23-2893
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MOHAMMED ABUHARBA
Defendant / Appellee:
CRAIG ASSELMEIER, Doctor, LORI OAKLEY, FRANK LAWRENCE and others
Childers v. Wills
as 3:2023cv03207
Petitioner:
James Leroy Childers
Respondent:
Anthony Wills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Noland v. Jones et al
as 3:2023cv03192
Plaintiff:
Kadeem Noland
Defendant:
Sergeant Jones, E. Kempfer and Anthony Wills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cutler v. Wills et al
as 3:2023cv03127
Plaintiff:
Chad Cutler
Defendant:
Anthony Wills, Menard Correctional Center, Illinois Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miles v. Wills et al
as 3:2023cv03087
Plaintiff:
Derrick Miles
Defendant:
Anthony D. Wills, Jessica Huffman, Yvette Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Richmiller et al
as 3:2023cv03276
Plaintiff:
Glen Phillips
Defendant:
Jonathan Richmiller, Brittany P Greene, Andrew Manton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armour v. Dolce et al
as 3:2023cv03072
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Armour
Defendant:
Connie Dolce, Angie Crane, Dearmond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vazquez v. Chausse et al
as 3:2023cv03050
Plaintiff:
Miguel Vazquez
Defendant:
J Chausse, Lt Hanks, Anthony Wills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
