Cases 71 - 80 of 17,229
Nelson v. Ujak et al
as 1:2024cv00773
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Nelson
Defendant:
Officer Ujak and Sgt. Keeba
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Thurston v. Bohrer et al
as 1:2024cv01095
Petitioner:
Richard Thurston
Respondent:
Bohrer and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01143
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
El-Bey v. Ndze et al
as 1:2024cv01096
Plaintiff:
Bro Stephen Michael El-Bey
Defendant:
Ndze, Farinloye and Boyd Cod
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Dinkins v. USA 2255
as 1:2024cv01178
Petitioner:
Anthony Dinkins
Respondent:
USA 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Cabeza Robles v. Wait Pesterfield
as 1:2024cv00518
Plaintiff:
Augustine E. Cabeza Robles and Agustin E. Cabeza Robles
Defendant:
Wait Pesterfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 1158 Immigration & Nationality Act, Section 208 (Asylum)
Hamilton v. Clerk of Courts et al
as 1:2024cv00646
Plaintiff:
Larry Hamilton, Jr., Larry Hamilton Bey, Jr. and Tusk
Defendant:
Clerk of Courts, State of Maryland, Agent #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Tilghman v. Princess Anne Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv00691
Plaintiff:
Bradford Tilghman
Defendant:
Princess Anne Police Department and Officer Thomas McMenemy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia-Ramos v. Medical Director John Doe et al
as 1:2024cv00522
Plaintiff:
Abraham Garcia-Ramos
Defendant:
Medical Director John Doe and Yes Care Health Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
